[Gross] which dnsbls?
jesse.thompson at doit.wisc.edu
Fri Dec 12 23:35:17 EET 2008
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jesse Thompson wrote:
>> Which dnsbls are people using with gross?
>> we're using:
>> and the sophos blocker
>> However, I'm thinking of disabling njabl, since we've had three cases
>> of semi-legitimate mass mailers being listed on njabl. Since we also
>> do connection limiting, the greylisting was causing these large
>> mailers to reconnect enough to run into our connection limiting. Does
>> anyone have any additional thoughts on njabl?
> Hi Jesse,
> -> bhnc.njabl.org
> This one is a bit safer, I have also seen false-positives with the one
> you mention.
Cool. I'll try it.
> In addition, dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net has also blocked IBM once, but you just
> need to set the tolerances higher if using dnsbl-X.uce*.
Yeah, I knew that was an aggressive one. But, we haven't had any
complaints about it yet.
> cbl.abuseat.org also false positives occasionally
> bl.spamcop.net & dnsbl.sorbs.net very accurate and result in few false
> positives (in my experience)
> As far as the sophos blocker, I have not tried/used it.
You have to be running Sophos PureMessage (or maybe a related product)
to use it.
Division of Information Technology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Email/IM: jesse.thompson at doit.wisc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3340 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Gross