[Gross] which dnsbls?
jpiszcz at lucidpixels.com
Fri Dec 12 22:30:38 EET 2008
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jesse Thompson wrote:
> Which dnsbls are people using with gross?
> we're using:
> and the sophos blocker
> However, I'm thinking of disabling njabl, since we've had three cases of
> semi-legitimate mass mailers being listed on njabl. Since we also do
> connection limiting, the greylisting was causing these large mailers to
> reconnect enough to run into our connection limiting. Does anyone have any
> additional thoughts on njabl?
This one is a bit safer, I have also seen false-positives with the one you
In addition, dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net has also blocked IBM once, but you just
need to set the tolerances higher if using dnsbl-X.uce*.
cbl.abuseat.org also false positives occasionally
bl.spamcop.net & dnsbl.sorbs.net very accurate and result in few false
positives (in my experience)
As far as the sophos blocker, I have not tried/used it.
More information about the Gross