[Gross] gross logging question
Jesse Thompson
jesse.thompson at doit.wisc.edu
Wed Nov 19 17:43:13 EET 2008
Eino Tuominen wrote:
> Jesse Thompson wrote:
>> Well, the stat_type and stat_interval options have nothing to do with
>> the log verbosity.
>>
>> The default logging level is the least verbose, so IIRC the only way to
>> avoid getting those logs in the default logging is to modify the code
>> before compiling. i.e. change those log command from LOG_INFO to
>> LOG_DEBUG. This should be easy for you to do, even if you aren't a
>> coder.
>>
>> Without thinking about it in depth, I can't think why those two log
>> entries really need to be in the default logging level. Perhaps it's
>> intentional, or it could be a regression.
>>
>> Eino probably has more to say about this.
>
> Yes, there indeed are some log entries still using wrong log levels.
> Those should be using LOG_DEBUG instead of LOG_INFO.
I committed the change to svn.
Jesse
--
Jesse Thompson
Division of Information Technology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Email/IM: jesse.thompson at doit.wisc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3353 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.utu.fi/pipermail/gross/attachments/20081119/06655509/attachment.bin>
More information about the Gross
mailing list